by Ivy Main, cross-posted from Power for the People VA
Welcome to ‚ÄúCrossover,‚ÄĚ the day on which the Virginia House and Senate have to finish the work on their bills and send them over to the other chamber. This is sudden death time; if a bill didn‚Äôt get across the finish line in time, it is dead for the year.
In past years, henceforth to be known as ‚Äúthe bad old days,‚ÄĚ almost nothing good even got out of committee, much less reached Crossover. Clean energy advocates could pretty much plan vacations for the second half of February.
This year the Democrats are on a tear, especially in the House. Yes, a lot of good bills have been heavily watered down. This is still the Old Dominion, with the emphasis on¬†Dominion. And it is definitely too early to break out the champagne, because the action isn‚Äôt over for the bills still in play. But overall, 2020 is shaping up to be a watershed year for clean energy.
BILLS STILL ALIVE
HB1526/SB851, the Clean Economy Act, has been the subject of intense and continuous negotiation. First there were a bunch of amendments that weakened it; then there were a bunch that strengthened it. It‚Äôs been a wild ride, and we may still see more changes during the second half of Session. But it‚Äôs alive!¬†(HB1526 passed the House 52-47; Democrats Rasoul and Carter voted no. SB851 passed the Senate on a party-line vote of 21-19.)
SB94¬†(Favola) rewrites the Commonwealth Energy Policy to bring it in line with Virginia‚Äôs commitment to dealing with climate change. The bill sets a target for net-zero greenhouse gas emissions economy wide by 2045, and in the electric sector by 2040. This section of the Code is for the most part merely advisory; nonetheless, it is interesting that Dominion Energy supported the bill.¬†(Passed the Senate 21-18, on party lines.)
Delegate Reid‚Äôs¬†HB714¬†is similar to SB94 but contains added details, some of which have now been incorporated into SB94.¬†(Passed the House 55-45 with a substitute.)
HB672¬†(Willett) establishes a policy ‚Äúto prevent and minimize actions that contribute to the detrimental effects of anthropogenic climate change in the Commonwealth.‚ÄĚ State agencies are directed to consider climate change in any actions involving state regulation or spending. Local and regional planning commissions are required to consider impacts from and causes of climate change in adapting comprehensive plans.¬†(Passed the House 55-44 with a substitute.)
HB547¬†(Delaney) establishes the Virginia Energy and Economy Transition Council to develop plans to assist the Commonwealth in transitioning from the use of fossil fuel energy to renewable energy by 2050.¬†The Council is to include members from labor and environmental groups.¬†(Passed the House 54-45.)
RGGI bills, good and bad
The Democratic takeover of the General Assembly means Virginia will finally join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), either according to the regulations written by DEQ or with a system in place that raises money from auctioning carbon allowances.
HB981¬†(Herring) and¬†SB1027¬†(Lewis) is called the Clean Energy and Community Flood Preparedness Act. It implements the DEQ carbon regulations and directs DEQ to enter the RGGI auction market. Auction allowances are directed to funds for flood preparedness, energy efficiency and climate change planning and mitigation. We are told this is the Administration‚Äôs bill. A similar bill,¬†HB20¬†(Lindsey), was incorporated into HB981.¬†(HB981 passed the House 53-46. SB1027¬†passed the Senate 22-18.)
SB992¬†(Spruill) requires the Air Board to give free allowances for three years to any new power plant that was permitted before June 26, 2019, the effective date of the carbon trading regulations. Essentially it gives special treatment to two planned gas generation plants that aren‚Äôt needed and therefore have sketchy economics unless they get this giveaway. Clean energy advocates will be looking to kill this one in the House.¬†(Passed the Senate 27-13. A number of Democrats who should know better voted for the bill.)
The Clean Economy Act contains a renewable portfolio standard (RPS) requiring utilities to include in their electricity mix a percentage of renewable energy that ratchets up over time. In addition,¬†HB1451¬†(Sullivan) is a stand-alone RPS bill that also includes an energy storage mandate. It appears to be identical to the RPS and storage provisions of the CEA (of which Sullivan is also the patron).¬†(Passed the House 52-47.)
Customer-sited solar/net metering
Solar Freedom¬†SB710¬†(McClellan) and¬†HB572¬†(Keam) lifts barriers to customer-sited renewable energy such as rooftop solar. The changes include lifting the caps on PPAs and net metering, and eliminating standby charges. Nearly identical versions were filed by Delegates Lopez (HB1184) (rolled into HB572) and Simon (HB912) (ditto).¬†SB532¬†(Edwards), a stand-alone bill to make PPAs legal, was rolled into SB710.¬†(SB710 passed the Senate 22-18 with a substitute that is much more limited than the original bill. HB572 passed the House with just a minor substitute 67-31.¬†HB1647¬†(Jones) is a Solar Freedom bill that also includes¬†community solar.¬†(Passed the House 55-45.)¬†Several provisions of Solar Freedom also appear in the Clean Economy Act.
HOAs¬†HB414¬†(Delaney) and¬†SB504¬†(Petersen) clarifies the respective rights of homeowners associations (HOAs) and residents who want to install solar. The law allows HOAs to impose ‚Äúreasonable restrictions,‚ÄĚ a term some HOAs have used to restrict solar to rear-facing roofs regardless of whether these get sunshine. The bill clarifies that HOA restrictions may not increase the cost of the solar facility by more than 5%, or decrease the expected output by more than 10%. (HB414 passed the House 95-4. SB504 passed the Senate 40-0.)
HB1647¬†(Jones) (see above) includes community solar in a bill that otherwise looks like Solar Freedom.
SB629¬†(Surovell) creates a program for ‚Äúsolar gardens.‚ÄĚ¬†(Substitute passed the Senate 39-0.)
HB1634¬†(Jones) requires utilities to establish shared-solar programs that allows customers to purchase subscriptions in a solar facility no greater than 5 MW. (Amended with a substitute; it now looks a lot like SB629. Passed the House 99-0.)
HB573¬†(Keam) affects the utility-controlled and operated ‚Äúcommunity solar‚ÄĚ programs required by 2017 legislation. The bill requires that ‚Äúan investor-owned utility shall not select an eligible generating facility that is located outside a low-income community for dedication to its pilot program unless the investor-owned utility contemporaneously selects for dedication to its pilot program one or more eligible generating facilities that are located within a low-income community and of which the pilot program costs equal or exceed the pilot program costs of the eligible generating facility that is located outside a low-income community.‚ÄĚ (Passed the House 90-8.)
The CEA contains detailed provisions for the buildout and acquisition of offshore wind.¬†HB234¬†(Mugler) directs the Secretary of Commerce and Trade to develop an offshore wind master plan.¬†(Passed House unanimously with substitute.)
SB860¬†(Mason) and¬†HB1664¬†(Hayes) puts the construction or purchase of at least 5,200 MW of offshore wind in the public interest.¬†(SB860 passed the Senate 22-18. HB1664 amended to incorporate HB1607, but with less gold-plating than the other bill. HB1664 passed the House 65-34.)
HB1607¬†(Lindsey) and¬†SB998¬†(Lucas) allows Dominion to recover the costs of building offshore wind farms as long as it has a plan for the facilities to be in place before January 1, 2028 and that it has used reasonable efforts to competitively source the majority of services and equipment. All utility customers in Virginia, regardless of which utility serves them, will participate in paying for this through a non-bypassable charge. Surely this bill came straight from Dominion.¬†(HB1607 amended to incorporate HB1664; only 1664 moves forward. SB998 passed the Senate 40-0.)
Nuclear and biomass
SB828¬†and¬†SB817¬†declare that any time the Code or the Energy Policy refers to ‚Äúclean‚ÄĚ or ‚Äúcarbon-free‚ÄĚ energy, it must be read to include nuclear energy. In subcommittee, Senator Lewis suddenly announced he was amending the bills to add ‚Äúsustainable biomass‚ÄĚ as well. After an uproar and a crash course on biomass, both bills eventually went back to being only about nuclear.¬†(Both bills passed the Senate unanimously.)¬†Unfortunately, some biomass from paper companies did creep into the Clean Economy Act in spite of the best efforts of clean energy advocates.
HB1526/SB851, the Clean Economy Act, contains a mandatory energy efficiency resource standard (EERS) and contains other provisions for spending on low-income EE programs.¬†HB981 (the RGGI bill) specifies that a portion of the funds raised by auctioning carbon allowances will fund efficiency programs.
There are also a few standalone efficiency bills.¬†HB1450¬†(Sullivan) and¬†SB354¬†(Bell) appear to be the same as the efficiency provisions of the CEA, though the standalone applies only to Dominion and APCo.¬†(HB1450 passed House 75-24,picking up a respectable number of Republicans. SB354 stricken at request of patron in C&L.)
HB1576¬†(Kilgore) doesn‚Äôt set new efficiency targets, but it makes it harder for large customers to avoid paying for utility efficiency programs. In the past, customers with over 500 kW of demand were exempt; this bill allows only customers with more than 1 MW of demand to opt out, and only if the customer demonstrates that it has implemented its own energy efficiency measures.¬†(Passed the House, 99-0.)
HB575¬†(Keam) beefs up the stakeholder process that Dominion and APCo engage in for the development of energy efficiency programs.¬†(Passed the House 99-0 and referred to Senate C&L.)
SB963¬†(Surovell) establishes the Commonwealth Efficient and Resilient Buildings Board to advise the Governor and state agencies about ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase resiliency. Every agency is required to designate and energy manager responsible for improving energy efficiency and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.¬†(Passed the Senate 40-0.)
SB628¬†(Surovell) requires the residential property disclosure statement provided by the Real Estate Board¬†to include advice that purchasers should obtain a residential building energy analysis as well as a home inspection prior to settlement.¬†(Passed the Senate 26-14.)
HB1183¬†(Lopez) requires the SCC to establish a task force on bulk energy storage resources.¬†(Passed the House 91-9 with a substitute.)
SB 632¬†(Surovell) creates a storage target of 1,000 MW and states that this is in the public interest.¬† Senator Surovell says this bill originated with the Governor‚Äôs office. (Passed the Senate 20-19 with a substitute.)
Siting, permitting, and other issues with utility-scale renewable energy
HB1327¬†(Austin) allows localities to impose property taxes on generating equipment of electric suppliers utilizing wind turbines at a rate that exceeds the locality‚Äôs real estate tax rate by up to $0.20 per $100 of assessed value. Under current law, the tax may exceed the real estate rate but cannot exceed the general personal property tax rate in the locality. Wind developer Apex Clean Energy helped develop the bill and supports it.¬†(Passed the House 81-12, now goes to Senate Finance.)
HB656¬†(Heretick) and¬†SB875¬†(Marsden) allow local governments to incorporate into their zoning ordinances national best practices standards for solar PV and batteries.¬†(Both bills passed their chambers unanimously with substitute language.)
HB1131¬†(Jones) and¬†SB762¬†(Barker) authorize localities to assess a revenue share of up to $0.55 per megawatt-hour on solar PV projects, in exchange for which an existing tax exemption is expanded.¬†(HB1131 Passed the House 54-42 with a substitute. SB762 passed Senate 40-0.)
HB657¬†(Heretick) and¬†SB893¬†(Marsden) exempt solar facilities of 150 MW or less from the requirement that they be reviewed for substantial accord with local comprehensive plans.¬†(HB657 passed the House with a substitute, 59-41. SB893 was passed by indefinitely‚ÄĒkilled‚ÄĒin Local Government.)
SB870¬†(Marsden) authorizes local planning commissions to include certain regulations and provisions for conditional zoning for solar projects over 5 MW.¬†(Passed Senate 40-0 with a substitute.)
HB1675¬†(Hodges) requires anyone wanting to locate a renewable energy or storage facility in an opportunity zone to execute a siting agreement with the locality.¬†(Passed House 89-7.)
Grants, tax deductions, tax credits and other financing
HB654¬†(Guy) authorizes DMME to sponsor a statewide financing program for commercial solar, energy efficiency and stormwater investments. The effect would be to boost the availability of Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE) in areas of the state where the locality has not developed a program of its own.¬†(Passed House 75-23. Assigned to Senate Committee on Local Government.)
SB754¬†(Marsden) authorizes utilities to establish on-bill financing of energy efficiency, electrification, renewable energy, EV charging, energy storage and backup generators.¬†(Passed Senate 40-0 with a substitute.)
HB1656¬†(O‚ÄôQuinn) authorizes Dominion and APCo to design incentives for low-income people, the elderly, and disable persons to install energy efficiency and renewable energy, to be paid for by a rate adjustment clause.¬†(Passed the House 95-4.)
HB1707¬†(Aird) makes changes to the Clean Energy Advisory Board, which is (already) authorized to administer public grant funding.¬†(Passed the House 65-33 with a substitute. Referred to Senate Ag.)
SB634¬†(Surovell) establishes the Energy Efficiency Subsidy Program to fund grants to subsidize residential ‚Äúefficiency‚ÄĚ measures, interestingly defined as solar PV, solar thermal or geothermal heat pumps. It also creates a subsidy program for electric vehicles.¬†(Passed the Senate 32-7. Senator Surovell has requested a¬†budget amendment¬†of $1 million for the fund. )
SB1039¬†(Vogel) allows a real property tax exemption for solar energy equipment to be applied retroactively if the taxpayer gets DEQ certification within a year.¬†(Passed the Senate 40-0.)
SB542¬†(Edwards) repeals the sunset date on crowdfunding provisions and provides fixes for certain existing obstacles to this financing approach.¬†(Passed the Senate 40-0.)
Customer rights to shop for renewable energy
HB868¬†(Bourne) and¬†SB376¬†(Suetterlein and Bell) allows customers to buy 100% renewable energy from any licensed supplier, regardless of whether their own utility has its own approved tariff.¬†(HB868 passd the House 55-44. But note that its Senate companion SB376 was passed by indefinitely in C&L.)
HB 889¬†(Mullin) and¬†SB 379¬†(McPike), the Clean Energy Choice Act, is broader than HB868. The legislation allows all customers to buy 100% renewable energy from any licensed supplier regardless of whether their utility has its own approved tariff. In addition, large customers (over 5 MW of demand) of IOUs also gain the ability to aggregate their demand from various sites in order to switch to a competitive supplier that offers a greater percentage of renewable energy than the utility is required to supply under any RPS, even if it is not 100% renewable. Large customers in IOU territory who buy from competing suppliers must give three years‚Äô notice before returning to their utility, down from the current five years. The SCC is directed to update its consumer protection regulations.¬†(HB889 passed the House 56-44. But its Senate companion SB379 passed by indefinitely in C&L.)
Other utility regulation
HB528¬†(Subramanyam) requires the SCC to decide when utilities should retire fossil fuel generation. (Passed the House 55-44.)
HB1132¬†(Jones, Ware) put the SCC back in control of regulating utility rates. (Passed the House 77-23.)
SB731¬†(McClellan) also affects rates, in this case by addressing a utility‚Äôs rate of return. The SCC determines this rate by looking first at the average returns of peer group utilities, and then often going higher. The bill lowers the maximum level that the SCC can set above the peer group average.¬†(Passed the Senate 38-1.)
HB167¬†(Ware) requires an electric utility that wants to charge customers for the cost of using a new gas pipeline to prove it can‚Äôt meet its needs otherwise, and that the new pipeline provides the lowest-cost option available to it. (Note that this cost recovery review typically happens after the fact, i.e., once a pipeline has been built and placed into service.) Last year Ware carried a similar bill that passed the House in the face of frantic opposition from Dominion Energy, before being killed in Senate Commerce and Labor.¬†(Passed the House unanimously with a substitute. It will now go to Senate C&L, where it may still have trouble from a Dominion-friendly committee.)
Green New Deal¬†HB77¬†(Rasoul) sets out an ambitious energy transition plan and includes a fossil fuel moratorium.¬†(Sent from Labor and Commerce to Appropriations, where it was not brought up. This is a polite way of killing a bill without anyone having to vote on it).
Undercutting RGGI¬†HB110¬†(Ware) says that if Virginia joins RGGI, DEQ must give free carbon allowances to any facility with a long-term contract predating May 17, 2017 that doesn‚Äôt allow recovery of compliance costs. Rumor has it the bill was written to benefit one particular company. (Left in Labor and Commerce.)
Clean energy standard¬†Instead of an RPS,¬†SB876¬†(Marsden) proposed a ‚Äúclean energy standard‚ÄĚ that made room for some coal and gas with carbon capture. (Recognizing a number of problems with this approach, Senator Marsden rolled his bill into SB851; that‚Äôs GA-speak for killing a bill while still giving the patron points for trying).
Greenhouse gas inventory¬†HB525¬†(Subrmanyam and Reid) require a statewide greenhouse gas inventory covering all sectors of the economy.¬†(Laid on the table in a subcommittee, which also means it was killed.)
Brownfields¬†HB1306¬†(Kory) directs the Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy to adopt regulations allowing appropriate brownfields and lands reclaimed after mining to be developed as sites for renewable energy storage projects.¬†(Stricken from docket in House Ag.)¬†HB1133¬†(Jones) makes it in the public interest for utilities to build or purchase, or buy the output of, wind or solar facilities located on previously developed sites.¬†(Continued to 2021, yet another polite way of killing a bill, though it leaves them not technically dead. So should we call them the undead? Let‚Äôs hope the concept is resurrected next year, anyway.)
Local action¬†HB413¬†(Delaney) authorizes a locality to include in its subdivision ordinance rules establishing minimum standards of energy efficiency and ‚Äúmaintaining access‚ÄĚ to renewable energy.¬†(Left in Cities, Counties and Towns.)
Retail choice¬†SB842¬†(Petersen) provides for all retail customers of electricity to be able to choose their supplier, and instructs the SCC to promulgate regulations for a transition to a competitive market for electricity. Existing utilities will continue to provide the distribution service. The bill also requires suppliers of electricity to obtain at least 25% of sales from renewable energy by 2025, 50% by 2030, and 100% by 2050. Renewable energy is defined to include ‚Äúsustainable biomass‚ÄĚ but not waste incineration or landfill gas. (Continued to 2021.)
Resilience hubs¬†HB959¬†(Bourne) directs DMME to establish a pilot program for resilience hubs. These are defined as a simple combination of solar panels and battery storage capable of powering a publicly-accessible building in emergency situations or severe weather events, primarily to serve vulnerable communities. (Continued to 2021.)
Net metering¬†HB1067¬†(Kory) deals with a specific situation where a customer has solar on one side of property divided by a public right-of-way, with the electric meter to be served by the solar array on the other side. The legislation declares the solar array to be located on the customer‚Äôs premises. (Item 4 of Solar Freedom would also solve the problem.) (Continued to 2021.)
HB1677¬†(Keam) replaces Virginia‚Äôs current vertically-integrated monopoly structure with one based on competition and consumer choice. Existing monopoly utilities would be required to choose between becoming sellers of energy in competition with other retail sellers, or divesting themselves of their generation portfolios and retaining ownership and operation of just the distribution system. Other features: a nonprofit independent entity to coordinate operation of the distribution system; performance-based regulation to reward distribution companies for reliable service; consumer choices of suppliers, including renewable energy suppliers; an energy efficiency standard; a low-income bill assistance program; and consumer protections and education on energy choices.¬†(This was politely continued to 2021 in Labor and Commerce with no debate. The patrons were complimented for ‚Äústarting a conversation.‚ÄĚ)
HB206¬†(Ware) was, I‚Äôm told, the beta version of Delegate Keam‚Äôs HB1677.¬†(Incorporated into HB1677, which was continued to 2021.)
SB842¬†(Petersen) seeks to achieve the same end as HB1677 and HB206, but it puts the SCC in charge of writing the plan. The bill provides for all retail customers of electricity to be able to choose their supplier, and instructs the SCC to promulgate regulations for a transition to a competitive market for electricity. Existing utilities will continue to provide the distribution service. The bill also requires suppliers of electricity to obtain at least 25% of sales from renewable energy by 2025, 50% by 2030, and 100% by 2050. Renewable energy is defined to include ‚Äúsustainable biomass‚ÄĚ but not waste incineration or landfill gas.¬†(Continued to 2021.)
Anti-renewable energy bills
HB205¬†(Campbell) adds unnecessary burdens to the siting of wind farms and eliminates the ability of wind and solar developers to use the DEQ permit-by-rule process for projects above 100 megawatts.¬†(Laid on the table in subcommittee.)¬†¬†HB1171¬†(Poindexter) is a make-work bill requiring an annual report of the acreage of utility scale solar development, as well as the acreage of public or private conservation easements.¬†(Continued to 2021.)¬†HB1636¬†(Campbell) prohibits the construction of any building or ‚Äústructure‚ÄĚ taller than 50 feet on a ‚Äúvulnerable mountain ridge.‚ÄĚ You can tell the bill is aimed at wind turbines because it exempts radio, TV, and telephone towers and equipment for transmission of communications and electricity.¬†(Laid on the table in subcommittee. FWIW, we‚Äôre told it was aimed at hotels, not wind. Yeah, sure . . .)¬†HB1628¬†(Poindexter) prohibits the state from joining RGGI or adopting any carbon dioxide cap-and-trade program without approval from the General Assembly.¬†(Passed by indefinitely in subcommittee. Yep, another way to kill a bill.)
HB461¬†(Sullivan) establishes a tax credit of 35%, up to $15,000, for purchases of renewable energy property. It is available only to the end-user (e.g., a resident or business who installs solar or a geothermal heat pump). Unfortunately, loose drafting would have also made the credit available for wood-burning stoves and other non-clean energy applications.¬†(Died in a Finance subcommittee on a 5-5 vote.)
HB633¬†(Willett) establishes a tax deduction up to $10,000 for the purchase of solar panels or Energy Star products.¬†(Stricken from docket in a Finance subcommittee.)
HB947¬†(Webert) expands the authority of localities to grant tax incentives to businesses located in green development zones that invest in ‚Äúgreen technologies,‚ÄĚ even if they are not themselves ‚Äúgreen development businesses.‚ÄĚ Green technologies are defined as ‚Äúany materials, components, equipment, or practices that are used by a business to reduce negative impacts on the environment, including enhancing the energy efficiency of a building, using harvested rainwater or recycled water, or installing solar energy systems.‚ÄĚ¬†(Continued to 2021.)
SB1061¬†(Petersen) allows residential customers to qualify for local government Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing programs for renewable energy and energy efficiency improvements; currently the availability of this financing tool is restricted to commercial customers.¬†(Continued to 2021.)
HB754¬†(Kilgore) establishes the Virginia Brownfield and Coal Mine Renewable Energy Grant Fund, which will support wind, solar or geothermal projects sited on formerly mined lands or brownfields.¬†(Left in Appropriations.)
[Updated February 12 to include late votes and fix a random meaningless line, and later to correct various other screw-ups that people have kindly brought to my attention.]
Post Views: 151