ELON Musk has gotten in trouble before for opening his mouth when he probably should have kept it shutâas when he infamously accused an Australian diver of being a pedophile for refusing his help rescuing kids trapped in a flooded cave. The diver is suing him for that.
And when Musk made serial promises he wasnât able to keep about the date heâd be able to deliver his âaffordableâ Model 3 electric car. Thousands whoâd put down earnest money deposits were kept waiting for months and even years before they ever got their car. When it finally did appear, Elon adjusted the price up from the promised $35K to almost $40K.
And there were the tweets that got him in trouble with the SEC.
Now heâs in trouble for keeping his mouth shut when he may have had a legal obligation to open it.
Tesla shareholders are suing Musk over his alleged failure to disclose critical facts about Solar City, the manufacturer of rooftop solar panels launched by his cousins, prior to its acquisition by Tesla for $2.6 billion back in 2016, including the fact that it was apparently insolvent at the time of its purchase and thus worth considerably less than $2.6 billion.
Though Musk recused himself from voting on the deal due to the family ties, the suit alleges he aggressively lobbied in favor of the acquisition in order to bail out his cousins by touting a $750 million contract Solar City had with the State of New York to build a facility in Buffalo.
The project is now embroiled in controversy over where that money wentâas well as (here we go again) Muskâs promises about a ârevolutionaryâ Solar Roof system that has yet to materialize.
According to unsealed court documents, Musk allegedly knew before the deal was consummated that Solar City hadnât fulfilled its contractual obligations with the state regarding capital expenditures and payments owed to vendors and had misled state officialsâincluding Gov. Andrew Cuomoâabout 1,460 âhigh payingâ jobs that would supposedly be created at the plant.
He also said that if Tesla didnât rescue Solar City, it (meaning his cousins) might be on the hook for $41.2 million in penalties for failing to meet contractually stipulated obligations.
The lawsuit also alleged that Musk shell-gamed $165 million from SpaceX (part of the Tesla empire) to prop up Solar City in 2015 and 2016. This transfer of funds was reportedly not disclosed prior to the purchase of Solar Cityâapparently to give the impression that this was cash flow.
The documents allege that an Ernst & Young audit âconcluded that Solar City was âshort of cashâ by $169 million of which, if you take out (the funds transferred from) SpaceX, they are barely at break even.â
Musk, in a statement released to the media after these allegations became public in September, said theyâre âbased on the claims of plaintiffâs lawyers looking for a payday.â
Maybe so. But whatâs not contestable is the failure of Solar City to deliver on its promise to develop âsolar roofs that look better than a normal roof, generate electricity, last longer, have better insulation and actually have a cost that is less than a normal roof plus the cost of electricity.â
It sounded goodâlike the $35,000 Model 3 Tesla with a 300-mile range. But sound was all investors ever got.
In the fall of 2016, Musk told stockholders: âWe expect to start doing Solar Roofs in volume somewhere next year.â Three years later, there is no evidence Solar City will ever produce Solar Roofs âin volume,â as he promised.
The company has trotted selected media through the Buffalo plant to view the work-in-progress, but one former employee says this was a carefully choreographed âdog and pony showâ meant to give a misleading impression about the imminence of a mass-produceable product.
The court documents state that ânone of the solar roof tiles at the (media) demonstration were even operational … it was a ânascent product,ââ i.e., something analogous to a concept car but represented as a production-ready car.
Tesla says it is continuing to work out âdurabilityâ and âsafetyâ issues with its Solar Roof system. Thatâs probably a good thing given that an unusual number of earlier-generation Solar City rooftop systems have caught fire, and the company has been sued by at least two insurance companies representing private individuals and large corporations who bought the panels and other hardware from Solar City.
And what about those âhigh techâ jobs Solar City used to cage $750 million out of the pockets of New York taxpayers? It turns out the average salary earned by workers at its Buffalo plant is $16.20 per hourâabout five bucks more than the current state minimum wage of $11.10 per hour.
The irony here is that Musk could have simply bailed out Solar City using his own funds and avoided another embarrassing and very public debacle. His net worth is estimated to be at least $20 billion, according to Forbes, so the $2.6 billion that went to bail out Solar Cityâand his cousinsâis practically chump change.
But Elon got all those billions by spending other peopleâs moneyâand selling things that either donât exist or arenât what was promised.